Forming a modern state criminal policy it is necessary to take into account the possibilities of the state to pay for the security of society and its financial capabilities. The combination of losses that are incurred as a result of the crime, their negative impact on the socio-economic development of the country forced the state to spend the financial resources on the protection from the criminal threats. As a terminological category of the calculation of aforementioned costs in the criminological literature, the term “price of the crime” is used.

The analysis of costs, losses and damages incurred by individuals, the state and the society as a result of the crime, allows to highlight the structural elements that make up the “price of the crime”, namely: costs of the state, society, legal entity and individuals on the prevention of crime, that is the implementation of special measures of protection against criminal anticipated risks; losses of the state, society, legal entity and individuals in connection with any crime; expenses to eliminate the consequences of crimes related to the restorationof the condition which concerns the crime, money compensation, insurance claims, medical care and the rehabilitation of victims and their families, a reduction in employment level, working productivity, losses of income fromthe closing of the organization, etc., government expenditures on the execution of punishment andthe prevention of recurrent crimes, that is the costs of the state bodies and public organizations that have been incurred in connection with the execution of punishment and resocialization of the prisonersand the implementation of measures which are directed on the prevention of the crime recidivism (the employment, the administrative supervision, the control of apparatus of probation and other law enforcement bodies).

The main conclusion to which researchers have come in the definition of “price of the crime” does not indicate the social consequences and losses incurred by the society as a result of illegal acts committed, but also it indicates aboutpossible direct impact of these costs on the rate of the economic development of the country. Therefore, the society have to controll the state activity, the law enforcement bodies including the penitentiary system constantly and carefully.

Key words: price, costs, losses, society, state, criminal policy.

REFERENCES

1. Babayev, M.М. and Kvashis, V. (2009), “Ye. Tsena prestupnosti: problemy metodologii i ugolovnoy politikiбThe price of criminality: the problems of methodology and criminal policy”, Sovremennye problemy i tendentsii razvitiya ugolovnogo prava, kriminologii i ugolovno-ispolnitelnogo prava Respubliki Kazakhstan, materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., KarYUI MVD RK im. B. Beysenova, Karaganda.

2. Babayev, M. M. and Kvashis, V. (2009), “Ye. Tsena prestupnosti: problemy teorii i praktiki”, The price of criminality: problems of theory and practice, Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzgliad, No. 2, рр. 8–12.

3. Gilinskiy, Y.A. and Kristi, N. (2001), “Borba s prestupnostyu kak industriya. Vpered k GULAGU zapadnogo obraztsa” Fighting against crime as an industry, Forward to the Western Gulag, translated by Petrova A. and Proklova V, ROO «Tsentr sodeystviya reforme ugolovnogo pravosudiya», Moskva.

4. Zer, Kh. (2002), “Vosstanovitelnoye pravosudiye: novyy vzgliad na prestupleniye i nakazaniye”, Restorative Justice: a new view at crime and punishment],  in Karnozovoy, L. and Pashina, S. (Ed.), Tsentr «Sudebno-pravovaya reforma», Moskva.

5. Zulkarnay, I. (2008), “Gosudarstvo kak firma po predostavleniyu obshchestvennykh uslug”, State as a company providing public services, Obshchestvo i ekonomika, No. 5, рр. 110–115.

6. Kvashis, V. (2008), “«Tsena» prestupnosti kak kriminologicheskaya problema”, “The price” of crime as a criminological problem, Ugolovnoye pravo, No. 6, рр. 94–102.

7. Kedov, V. (2002), Gosudarstvo i ekonomika: meniayushcheyesia ravnovesiye”, State and Economy: Changing Equilibrium, Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, No. 3, рр. 8–13.

8. Kondratiuk, L. and Ovchinskiy, V.S. (2008), “Kriminologicheskoye izmereniye”, Criminological easurement, Norma, Moskva.

9. Kudriavtsev, V.N. (1983), “Ugolovnaya yustitsiya kak sistema”, Criminal Justice as a system, Pravovaya kibernetika, No. 4, р.89–94.

10. Mill, Dzh.S. (1980), “Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii”, Fundamentals of Political Economy, translated by Mileykovskogo, A.G., Progress, Moskva.

11. Naumov, A. (2008), Ugolovnaya statistika: prestupnost i yeye stabilnost”, Criminal statistics: crime and its stability, Ugolovnoye pravo, No. 4, рр. 134–137

12. Samiuelson, P.A., Nordhauz, V.D. (1995), Makroekonomika, Osnovy, Kyiv, рр. 544.

13. Smit, A. (2009), “Issledovaniye o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva n arodov”, Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples, Antologiya ekonomicheskoy mysli, Eksmo, Moskva.

14. Staroverova, O.V. (2006), “«Tsena» nalogovoy prestupnosti”, “The price” of tax crime, Zakon i pravo, YUNITI-DANA, Moskva.

15. Stern, V. (2000), “Grekh protiv budushchego. Tiuremnoye zakliucheniye v mire”, Sin against the future. Imprisonment in the world, PRI, Moskva.

16. Shamis, A.(1994), “Ispravitelnoye vozdeystviye na osuzhdennykh – sotsialnaya funktsiya ITU”, Corrective effect on convicts – social function of the ITU. Prestupleniye i nakazaniye, No. 12, рр. 37-40.

17. Мiller, T., Kohen, M. And Witrsema, B. (1969), “Cost and Constquences: a new Look. Final”, National Institute of Justice.

18. Sinclair, М. and Taylor, C. (2008), Cost of Crime, available at: http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/