The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of procedural actions at the stage of preparation for the execution of an executive inscription. The content of these actions is aimed at establishing the subject matter of proof, i.e. the conditions for the execution of the writ of execution, which include compliance with the limitation period and the submission of documents confirming the indisputability of the debt.

The author establishes that when establishing the subject matter of proof, a notary must first of all determine whether the creditor has complied with the deadlines for filing an application for an executive inscription, since their omission will indicate non-compliance with one of the conditions, which may result in a refusal to perform a notarial act. In this case, there is no need to further investigate the documents submitted and determine whether the debt is indisputable. Although the statute of limitations under which an enforcement action may be taken is similar to the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit, they have different legal nature.

Analysing the notarial procedural legislation, the author comes to the conclusion that the establishment of indisputability of debt means only verification of documents for compliance with the approved list. The determination of indisputability is purely formal without the need to notify the debtor, which is a disadvantage, as it violates his legitimate rights and interests. To solve this problem, appropriate changes to the procedure for making an executive inscription have been proposed.

The author establishes that the stage of preparation for the execution of an executive inscription is important for this notarial proceeding, since it is at this stage that the notary finds out whether there are legal grounds for a notarial act by checking the statute of limitations, compliance of the claim with the legal requirements, completeness of the documents submitted, correctness of the payments made by the claimant, absence of a dispute between the parties, and indisputability, which should be carried out not only formally through the study of documents, but also procedurally, by notifying the debtor.

Key words: notary, notarial proceedings, stages of notarial proceedings, executive inscription, indisputability of debt.

References

1. Komarov, V.V. and Barankova V.V. (2011), Notary in Ukraine: textbook, Pravo, Kharkiv.
2. Fursa S.Ya., Fursa Ye.I., Bordiuh T.O. and Fursa Ye.Ye. (2021), Notarial process. Interactive course (with practical): textbook, Alerta, Kyiv.
3. Fursa S.Ya. (2012), Theory of the notarial process: scientific and practical manual, Alerta, Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, Kyiv.
4. Didenko L.V. (2023), “Notarial procedure as a type of legal process”, Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, vol. 1, No. 79, pp. 187-191. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.32
5. Servetnyk A.H. (2020), “Notary’s executive inscription as a way to implement notarial forms of civil rights protection”: thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Kyiv.
6. Servetnyk A.H. (2018), “The subject of proof in notarial proceedings for the execution of an executive inscription”, Law and society, No. 3, part 2, pp. 85-91.
7. Ukraine (1993), About the notary: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
8. Vovk M.Z. and Yurkevych Y.M. (2019), “Certain Issues of Legal Regulation of the Procedure for Making an Executive Inscription by a Notary”, Comparative and analytical law, No. 6, pp. 114-117. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2019.6.26
9. Melnyk I.S. (2013), “Procedural peculiarities of making executive inscriptions under notarised transactions”, Our law, No. 10, pp. 155-160.
10. Posikira R.R. and Porayko A.M. (2019), Mortgage: legal conclusions of the Supreme Court, West Ukrainian Consulting Centre, Lviv.
11. Ukraine (2019), case No. 916/313/18: court order, Commercial Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court, Kyiv, URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85211446 (accessed 24.08.2024).
12. Demchenko O. (2019), “Notary’s executive inscription as an out-of-court form of protection of civil rights and legitimate interests”, Entrepreneurship, economy and law, No. 3, pp. 15-20.
13. Ukraine (1999), On Approval of the List of Documents for Debt Recovery on the Basis of Which Debt Recovery is Undisputed on the Basis of Executive Inscriptions of Notaries: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, Kyiv, URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1172-99-%D0%BF#Text (accessed 24.08.2024).
14. Servetnyk A.H. (2017), “Notary’s executive inscription: concept and signs”, Theory and practice of jurisprudence, No. 2 (12), URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/tipp_2017_2_7 (accessed 24.08.2024). https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2017.12.115431
15. Kolomiets Y.L. (2020), “Determination of indisputability when making executive inscriptions”, Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 71-77. https://doi.org/10.32844/2618-1258.2020.5-1.11
16. Shcherbyna E.M. and Kulova A.A. (2018), “Certain shortcomings of the legislation on debt collection under notaries’ executive inscriptions”, Law and society. Civilistics, No. 6, part 1, pp. 89-93.
17. Hnativ O., Butryn-Boka N. and Bazan I. (2021), ” Cancellation of a notary’s executive inscription “, Current issues of jurisprudence, No. 3(27), pp. 117-122. https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.03.117
18. Sindevich O. (2020), “Theoretical Problems of the Legal Force of a Notarial Deed in the Doctrine of the Notarial Process of Ukraine”, Law of Ukraine, No. 9, pp. 170-182.
19. Kolomiets Y.L. (2022), “Implementation of the procedural component of the principle of legality in the execution of an executive inscription by a notary”, Juridical scientific and electronic journal, No. 6, pp. 109-114. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-6/26