The article examines the administrative and legal regulation of prohibitions and restrictions, which are conditioned by the administrative and legal status of the personnel of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine. The author examines the concepts of ‘prohibitions’ and ‘restrictions’ for the personnel of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine and reveals the essence of the above concepts. It is noted that the active processes of Ukraine’s European integration, which are due, among other things, to Ukraine’s aspirations to join the European Union, set a number of requirements and tasks for the legislator to create appropriate conditions for the functioning of law enforcement institutions and bring them in line with European standards. The author describes the features of prohibitions and restrictions that appear for the personnel of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine upon entering service or commencement of employment and notes that they are specific to a certain category of persons, are limited in time, and are preventive in nature. The author presents the author’s position on restrictions and prohibitions where a person cannot exercise a right or freedom to the fullest extent or should refrain from actions to implement the latter in order to prevent negative consequences. It is proposed to reduce the range of prohibitions and restrictions for the staff of the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine in terms of paid activities, if such activities do not contradict the ideas and principles of the service. The author examines the international regulations which outline the main prohibitions and restrictions for penitentiary personnel. It is found that prohibitions and restrictions are directly related to the administrative and legal status of a person. Accordingly, the regulation of prohibitions and restrictions takes place in accordance with the plane in which the person is located.

Key words: personnel of the State Criminal Execution Service, prohibitions and restrictions, corruption, legal status, administrative and legal status, European integration, professional activity, civil service, civil servants, employees, penitentiary institutions.

References

1. Rauhala, E., Suliman, A. and Ariès, Q. (2022), «Ukraine should get E.U. candidate status, European Commission recommends», Washington Post, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/17/european-commission-candidate-eu-ukraine-war/ (accessed 30 June 2024).
2. Shymon, O. (2020), Restrictions and prohibitions as a means of preventing administrative offences related to corruption in the activities of civil servants in Ukraine : Monograph. Odesa: Helvetica Publishing House. P. 168.
3. Shymon, O. (2020), Restrictions and prohibitions as a means of preventing administrative offenses related to corruption in the activities of civil servants in Ukraine. PhD thesis. Zaporizhzhia, Р. 201, available at:http://phd.znu.edu.ua/page/PhD/Shymon_dis.pdf (accessed 30 June 2024).
4. Panteleev, S. (2018), «The concept of anti-corruption prohibitions and restrictions in the activities of special entities», Legal systems. Scientific and practical electronic journal, No.3, PP. 265-277, available at: http://legalsystems.net.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/”ПРАВОВІ-СИСТЕМИ”_2018_3..pdf#page=265 (accessed 30 June 2024).
5. Seletskyi, O. (2018), «Legal characteristics of prohibitions and restrictions related to diplomatic service», Administrative law and administrative process, information law, part. 2, Vol. 2, PP. 135-140. available at:https://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d79dc15c-7055-449b-81fc-4a75eb666b9e/content (accessed 30 June 2024).
6. Lupu, A. K. (2020), Administrative and legal enforcement of anti-corruption restrictions in the public service of Ukraine. Candidate’s thesis. Ternopil. available at:http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/41777/1/disertacja%20lupu.pdf (accessed 30 June 2024).
7. Ukraine (2005), On the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
8. Ukraine (2014), On the prevention of corruption: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
9. Zlyvko, S., Sykal M. (2019). «The essence and concept of administrative and legal provision of personnel training for the penitentiary system of Ukraine», Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law, No.3, (8), РР. 55-65. available at: https://sjlaw.academysps.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/text-pdf-3-8-2019/5.%20Zlyvko%20S.V.,%20Sykal%20M.M..pdf (accessed 30 June 2024). https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2019.03.055
10. Council of Europe Recom (2006), European Prison Rules: recommendation, the Committee of Ministers.
11. United Nations Organization (1955), Rules of the Org. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners: the General Assembly, New York.
12. United Nations Organization (1998), Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment: the General Assembly, New York.
13. United Nations Organization (1996), International Code of Conduct for Public Officials: the General Assembly, New York.

.