DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY OF PERSONNEL OF THE STATE CRIMINAL AND EXECUTIVE SERVICE OF UKRAINE: CONCEPTS, FEATURES

Author (s): Korostashivets I.M.

Work place:

Korostashivets I.M.,

Postgraduate Officer of the Department of Administrative, Civil and

Commercial Law and Process, Deputy Head of the Department of

Legal Support and Claims Work,

Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine

ORCID: 0000-0002-5691-2370

Language: Ukrainian

Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law No 3(14): 31-43

https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2021.03.031

Summary

The article summarizes the normative and theoretical definitions of  the concept of discipline, service discipline, on the basis of which the definition of the concept of disciplinary responsibility of the personnel of the State Criminal and Executive Service (hereinafter SCES) as for knowledge by a person from the specified category of persons regarding violation of the norms of service and labor discipline in the form of disciplinary misconduct of coercive measures (penalties), which are expressed in the deprivation of certain benefits of personal, property or organizational nature, which are carried out by officials in the order of subordination and in the procedural form prescribed by law.

The disciplinary responsibility of  SCES personnel arises on the basis of certain factual and normative grounds. It is established that the criteria for distinguishing disciplinary liability from other types of legal liability are the type, level of public danger and the consequences of the offense.

The characteristic features of disciplinary responsibility of SCES personnel are highlighted, namely: 1) is realized on the basis of realization by the subject of responsibility of a disciplinary misconduct; 2) is a violation of labor discipline and official duties; 3) has an expression in action or inaction, is allowed knowingly or negligently; 4) entails a disciplinary sanction, the purpose of which is to educate the violator of conscientious attitude to the order of service, official and work responsibilities; 5) the subjects authorized to apply disciplinary sanctions in the specified system of bodies and institutions are officials in the order of subordination.

Key words: discipline, disciplinary responsibility, State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine, personnel, bases of disciplinary responsibility, structure system of disciplinary responsibility, disciplinary misconduct.

References

  1. Samofalov, L. P., Borysenko, І. V. and Shevchenko, D. M. (2018), “On the question of the concept of discipline and disciplinary responsibility of the rank and command staff of the Criminal and Executive Service”, Criminal and Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow, No. 1 (3), рр. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2018.02.037
  2. Sykal, М. М. and Pukhovets, А. V. (2018), “Peculiarities of disciplinary responsibility of the personnel of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine”, Criminal and Executive System of Ukraine and its role in building of legal and social state: materials of the ІІІ online scientific-practical conference (November 27, 2018), Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, рр. 368–372. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2018.02.129
  3. Kuprianova, А. О. (2019), Legal regulation of disciplinary liability of state executors: PhD in Law thesis, Kharkiv.
  4. Harasymov, О. І. (2013), “Disciplinary liability of personnel of law enforcement bodies”, Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Legal series, No. 2, рр. 138–145.
  5. Ukraine (2015), On State Service: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  6. Ukraine (2006), On the Disciplinary Statute of Law Enforcement Bodies: Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  7. Ukraine (2020), On Approval of the Rules of Internal Labor Regulations of the Personnel of the Department: Order of the Department of Issues of Execution of Criminal Punishments, Kyiv, available at: https://kvs.gov.ua/wp–content/uploads/2020/06/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0 %D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0–%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%83%D1 %82%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE–%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1% 8F%D0%B4%D0%BA%D1%83.pdf(accessed 01 October 2021).
  8. Melnyk, K. Yu. (2014), Labor law of Ukraine: manual, Disa plus, Kharkiv.
  9. Mykolenko, А. I. (2004), Administrative process and administrative responsibility in Ukraine: manual, Odissei, Kharkiv.
  10. Sereda, V. V. (2014), “Concept, characteristics and composition of disciplinary misconduct”, Scientific notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, No. 12, рр. 125–129.
  11. Novak, О. D. (2012), “Disciplinary misconduct as a basis for disciplinary liability of civil servants”, Journal of Kyiv Law University, No. 2, рр. 129–133.
  12. Ukraine (2017), Code of Professional Ethics of the Personnel of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine: Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Kyiv, available at: http://govua.in.ua/index.php /struktura/istoriya-2?layout=edit&id=898 (accessed 01 October 2021).

[collapse]

Full text

©2024. Penitentiary academy of Ukraine